SPOKESMAN CONTINUES TO SPEW POISON AGAINST DASAM GRANTH SAHIB
PANTHIC.ORG
| Published on May 8, 2009
ANANDPUR SAHIB (KP)--This past week, the notorious Rozana Spokesman published an article once again criticizing the bani of Guru Gobind Singh Ji. The "news" published by the Spokesman raises questions over a so-called "recent discovery" by Principal Surinder Singh of Sikh Missionary College.
It should be mentioned that recently, during his visit to Takht Sri Kesgarh Sahib, Principal Surinder Singh, who is notorious for anti-Dasam Granth Sahib statements, found two saroops with bani of Guru Granth Sahib printed along with Dasam Granth Sahib. Without researching the matter further, Surinder Singh conveyed the information to Rozana Spokesman, which in turn condemned the presence of the saroops.
Such anti-Panthic statements by Rozana Spokesman are totally distressing and unacceptable. With what research and standing has the Rozana Spokesman published the news article condemning the saroops. Was the concern raised and cleared by Akal Takht Sahib before the bani of the Sikh Gurus was condemned by the Spokesman? In addition to these claims, the following remain a reason to be concerned:
-
In its edition published on May 6, Rozana Spokesman refers to saroops of Guru Granth Sahib as "Saroops of Shabad Guru." Is there any other Guru besides Guru Granth Sahib?
-
The publication explicitly states that the saroops were found while researching historical saroops. Does it not stand to reason that these saroops could potentially also be historical?
-
In the same article, it is stated that the bani of Dasam Granth Sahib, starting from Jaap Sahib until the very end, also appears right after the bani of Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Doesn’t this finding lead the staff of Rozana Spokesman to wonder why Charitropakhyan’s bani also exists in this Granth?
-
The article calls for a meeting of so-called ‘Panthic Scholars’. The Panth has already passed a resolution seeking a ban on anti-Dasam Granth Sahib propaganda. What will the new, pseudo-conclave, conclude about the newly found saroops.
Panthic Weekly is not in any position to make a definite statement about the existence of these saroops; however we can conclude the fact that Akal Takht Sahib has barred all Sikhs from taking part in anti-Dasam Granth Sahib activities. In addition, Panthic conclaves have in the past challenged anti-Panthic individuals several times to discuss the matter and clear their doubts; however all appeals have been ignored by the notorious Kala Afghana lobby as they seem to only want to stir trouble.
|
| | Other Related Articles:
| | (Feb 10th, 2010) | | (Jan 16th, 2010) | | (Nov 6th, 2009) | | (Nov 6th, 2009) | | (Jun 5th, 2009) | | (May 22nd, 2009) | | (Apr 24th, 2009) | | (Feb 20th, 2009) | | (Jan 16th, 2009) | | (Nov 28th, 2008) | | (Oct 17th, 2008) | | (Sep 12th, 2008) | | (Sep 5th, 2008) | | (May 30th, 2008) | | (May 30th, 2008) | | (May 23rd, 2008) | | (May 16th, 2008) | | (May 2nd, 2008) | | (May 2nd, 2008) | | (Apr 25th, 2008) | | (Apr 25th, 2008) | | (Mar 13th, 2008) | | (Mar 6th, 2008) | | (Feb 28th, 2008) | | (Feb 14th, 2008) | | (Feb 7th, 2008) | | (Jan 31st, 2008) | | (Jan 31st, 2008) | | (Jan 24th, 2008) | | (Jan 24th, 2008) | | (Jan 24th, 2008) | | (Jan 17th, 2008) | | (Jan 17th, 2008) | | (Jan 17th, 2008) | | (Oct 24th, 2007) | | (Oct 10th, 2007) | | (Sep 5th, 2007) | | (Apr 4th, 2007) | | (Nov 29th, 2006) | | (Nov 8th, 2006) | | (Oct 25th, 2006) | | (Oct 21st, 2006) | | (Oct 19th, 2006) | | (Oct 18th, 2006) | | (Oct 11th, 2006) | | (Oct 11th, 2006) | | (Sep 20th, 2006) | | (Sep 13th, 2006) | | (Apr 2nd, 2006) |
 | |
Disclaimer: Panthic.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the feedback from our readers, and cannot be held responsible for their views.
POST FEEDBACK:
|
|
